« Previous page |
Main
| Next page »
Health Insurance and Health Care Reform Won’t Meet August Deadline
Sunday Jul 26, 2009
Health Insurance and Health Care Reform Won’t Meet August Deadline in Individual Health Insurance
Malcolm Smith, the Senate's top
Democrat, conceded yesterday that the chamber won't pass an overhaul of health care
and health insurance by August. In a townhall meeting
that same day, President Obama accepted this fact, as long as he sees
"folks working diligently and consistently,” reports The Wall Street Journal.
While Nancy
Pelosi confirmed that the house bill would pass before the summer recess, the
Senate Finance Committee is singing a different tune. They remain deadlocked
over key details, not least of which is how to pay for the plan. The Senate
Finance Committee is notably the only group trying to craft a bipartisan bill.
But concern over
cost is rising across the board.
Nine Senate
Democrats have addressed a letter to Senate Finance Chairman Max Baucus,
protesting that too little focus has been given to keeping down health costs.
House Republican
leader John Boehner of Ohio said Thursday, "Despite what President Obama
claims, the bill he is promoting today will make health care even more
expensive."
Even at the friendly
townhall meeting in Ohio, a 14-year-old incoming high-school freshman asked the
president if he was pushing too much, too fast. Mr. Obama replied that, "Reform
may be coming too soon for some in Washington, but it's not soon enough for the
American people. We can get this done."
But this kind of
response is garnering another growing criticism of the current administration:
That their solutions are based on rhetoric and not reality.
Comments[0]
Health Insurance Industry Jumps in With Major Ad Campaign
Wednesday Jul 22, 2009
Health Insurance Industry Jumps in With Major Ad Campaign in Individual Health Insurance
The health insurance industry stepped
into the ring this week with a seven-figure ad campaign, reports The
Washington Post. While it is a notably more
subtle approach than the Harry and Louise ads they scuttled at the Clintons’
health care plans 15 years ago, it still has its barbs.
America’s Health
Insurance Plans (AHIP) ads promote the idea that everyone should have health insurance. They argue that health reform
would not only help millions of Americans get care, but that it would also
vastly expand the market, stating, “If everyone’s covered, we can make health
care as affordable as possible.”
Of course, this
harkens back to our earlier post on Wal-Mart’s endorsement of an employer mandate. Ever
since it became clear that some form of health care reform would indeed
materialize, major players have been getting on board in order to secure
certain provisions. In Wal-Mart’s case, it was to guarantee a trigger mechanism
to contain costs.
For AHIP, it is a
sort of escape hatch in a proposed system of consumer protections. They have
made it clear they would like to see the public option vanish from the bill
entirely.
To support this
contention, the ads have included data from a poll by The New York Times and CBS that, "77 percent of Americans are
satisfied with their existing health insurance coverage."
Critics were
quick to point out that the same poll included statistics that argued
otherwise. For example, by 72 to 20 percent, Americans favor the creation of a
public plan. Respondents also felt that government would do a better job than private
insurers of limiting health care costs and providing coverage.
In
addition, a Kaiser Family Foundation poll, compiled at the request of The
Washington Post last year, suggests that the people who like their health plans
the most are the people who use them the least.
AHIP’s
30-second ad will run for a week. The debate that has ensued will no doubt go
much longer.
Comments[0]
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida To Sell Health Insurance Plans In Storefronts
Friday Jul 17, 2009
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida To Sell Health Insurance Plans In Storefronts in Individual Health Insurance
In an interesting
retail turn of events, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida announced they will
start selling health insurance through retail storefronts — much like
how cell phone companies currently sell coverage plans.
The storefronts will open up to eight retail stores
in the state, including the Miami-Dade area, reported the Miami Herald.
“Health insurance is complicated and we
know it. Some people like face-to-face interactions, and that’s what
we’re providing,” Doug Bartel, spokesperson for BCBS of Florida.
One of the biggest reasons for the move is that
many small companies, in Miami in particular, don’t offer
employer-sponsored group health insurance, so there are a lot of residents looking
for affordable Florida
health insurance.
Bartel also said that BCBS of Florida wants to make
sure they offer plenty of alternatives to getting information about health insurance.
One Florida resident said they liked using the Internet,
but would rather have a one-on-one experience when it comes to purchasing a
policy.
It makes sense that people want some kind of advice
when purchasing something as important as health insurance. Still, this effort
seems like it’s going to be a lot of overhead for the insurer.
Comments[0]
Seniors To Save More On Prescription Drugs
Tuesday Jun 23, 2009
Seniors To Save More On Prescription Drugs in Individual Health Insurance
This
week, the big pharmaceutical companies agreed to help seniors better afford
their prescription drugs, particularly when they reach a major gap in coverage
with their Medicare Part D plans.
With Medicare
prescription drug coverage, informally known as Medicare
Part D, seniors have all their prescription drugs covered up until they
reach $2,700 in total costs for the year. After reaching $2,700, seniors get zero
coverage until those costs go over $6,100.
It’s a whopping $3,400 gap, commonly
known as the “doughnut hole.”
Now, drug companies say they’ll give
seniors a 50 percent discount for their medication if they fall in the doughnut
hole, reported The New York Times.
President Obama hailed this move as a “historic
agreement to lower drugs costs,” but as the Times article pointed
out, the federal government might not reap any of the benefits.
Because the half-off discount only eases
out-of-pocket costs for seniors who reach the doughnut hole, the government gets
left out of the deal.
But really, if we had to pick who would save money
between the people and the government, we ought to choose the people every single
time.
Comments[0]
Will Health Insurance Co-ops Answer Reform's Biggest Question?
Monday Jun 22, 2009
Will Health Insurance Co-ops Answer Reform's Biggest Question? in Individual Health Insurance
The
biggest question is of course: Will Congress enact a public health insurance plan?
If not, there’s now an alternative. Last
week, the U.S. Senate Finance Committee offered the idea of health insurance
cooperatives to take the place of that pesky “public”
health insurance plan idea.
U.S. Senator Kent Conrad, the Finance Committee
member who proposed the co-ops, said it was designed mostly to compromise with
Republicans who are so adamantly against a public plan.
According to a Time Magazine article, 50 separate cooperatives would
be created for each of the 50 states.
Because the co-ops would be required to self-insure
by covering the cost of claims entirely with premiums paid by members, the name
of the game would be volume. The more members a cooperative had to pay premiums,
the easier they’d be able to keep costs low. Lower population states
would be able to join with other states nearby to form regional cooperatives.
To start up the co-ops, the government would initially
have to kick in some $4 billion.
But unfortunately for this back-up plan, there’s
been little success with health insurance cooperatives, according to the Time
article.
Most cooperatives have a hard time staying financially
solvent and keeping its members and providers happy. The two exceptions are
Seattle’s Group Health and Minneapolis’ Health Partners.
Both have enjoyed success largely because they provide both health
insurance and health care services — with their own
networks of physicians, hospitals, and clinics.
Unless the government can execute the co-op idea
perfectly, it could easily crash and burn. Politically speaking, co-ops might
seem less controversial, but without confidence in a solid plan, it too could just
be a pipe dream.
So far, it doesn’t look like co-ops are the
answer.
Comments[0]
Report: Health Insurance Fraud Increasing
Friday Jun 19, 2009
Report: Health Insurance Fraud Increasing in Individual Health Insurance
Health insurance fraud is on the rise.
Lt. Robert Sebby, who investigates medical identity theft cases, blames
unemployment and the failing economy, reports the Las Vegas Sun.
Our
migration to electronic medical records probably isn’t helping much
either.
Pam
Dixon, executive director of the nonprofit World Privacy Forum and author of a
report on medical identity theft, warns that without extensive safeguards, we
are going to see this type of crime skyrocket.
Remember
the medical clerk in Florida a few years ago who downloaded the records of more
than 1,000 Medicare patients and
gave them to a relative, who made $2.8 million in fraudulent claims with them?
While
we agree with the president’s call for electronic medical records
(EMR), we hope that it is done with strategy and foresight. A lot of strategy
and foresight. Who wants to get a surprise bill for a diabetic’s
dialysis in Maryland or an addict’s prescription swindle in Oregon?
Straightening
out stolen health care is a special kind of red tape nightmare. Strict patient
privacy laws and the decentralized bureaucracy of insurance providers
complicates things to Kafka-esque levels.
So,
let’s indeed proceed into the brave new world of computerized medical
records, but let’s make sure that part of the $19 billion earmarked
for the job is used to adequately protect patients’ information.
Comments[0]
Public-Private Health Insurance Plan Launched In Miami
Tuesday May 26, 2009
Public-Private Health Insurance Plan Launched In Miami in Individual Health Insurance
As
the health insurance and health care debate rolls on in Washington, a new health
plan launched today in Miami, Florida, reported the Miami Herald.
But this new Florida
health insurance plan is special for one big reason: it’s a
public-private health plan.
Yes, one of the
biggest sticking points for lawmakers, lobbyists, and health industry
executives on Capitol Hill has just went through in Florida.
It did, though, take
the county five years to finalize.
Still a
public-private health insurance plan in action is
sure to pique interests. And if successful, this plan could be used as a
national model.
The new health plan
is adminstered by Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida and offers a $250 deductible,
$10 copayment for generic prescription drugs, and has premiums of around $110.
Individuals up to
age 65 years of age have access to the plan, along with employees in small businesses
with up to 50 workers.
According to the
Herald article, the main factor that made the plan possible was convincing
health care providers to accept lower payments for care. In total, the plan’s
network includes 1,500 doctors and seven major hosptials in the Miami-Dade
area.
While officials
expect the plan to help the some 600,000 uninsured residents in the area, they
point out BCBS of Florida may deny coverage for those with pre-exisiting health
conditions.
Comments[0]
Kaiser Family Foundation Poll Finds Americans Support Health Reform, Taxing The Wealthy To Pay For Care, and Skip Care Because of Costs
Friday Apr 24, 2009
Kaiser Family Foundation Poll Finds Americans Support Health Reform, Taxing The Wealthy To Pay For Care, and Skip Care Because of Costs in Individual Health Insurance
Every month, the Kaiser Family Foundation does a tracking poll
that’s devoted specifically to health care and health insurance.
The results they get from this poll are pretty
insightful, and provide a decent gauge of where the current public opinion
stands in regards to the health industry.
Here are a few of the juicy tidbits from the April
tracking poll, as reported by Medical News Today:
- 59%
say health care reform is “more important than ever”
- 36%
skipped doctor and dentist check ups because of high costs
- 26%
say someone in their household had trouble paying health care bills in the past
year
- 71%
support raising taxes for high-income Americans to pay for health care reform
- 67%
“strongly” or “somewhat” favor a public
health insurance
plan to compete with private plans
So what does it all mean?
We see that public option
is starting to heavily lean in the direction of “action now”
on health care and health insurance reform, and that a growing number of
Americans are starting to feel the burn of rising costs.
Politically speaking,
this is great news for lawmakers itching to pass sweeping reform. The Kaiser
poll suggests they’ll have majority support, and may be able to push
through the broadest and most comprehensive health care legislation in recent
history.
But take these polls with
a grain of salt. While they’re a snapshot of public opinion in the
now, things can change like the blink of an eye — especially with our
current and fluctuating economic problems.
And as most can guess,
Democrats and Republicans don’t so much agree on how we go about
reform.
Ah the joys of health
care politics.
Comments[0]
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Decides To Raise Rates for Individual Health Insurance Policies
Monday Apr 13, 2009
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Decides To Raise Rates for Individual Health Insurance Policies in Individual Health Insurance
In
light of a $144.9 million loss in 2008, Blue
Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan has decided to make some changes
that will affect rates for their individual
health insurance plans.
The Wolverine State’s largest health
insurer will also stop further enrollment for a few of their older, less
expensive health plans, such as the Individual Care Blue individual plan,
reported the Detroit News.
There’s a catch. Before BCBS of Michigan
can increase rates for their individual plans, they have to get approval from
the state. So far, no word on their chances of getting these rate-ups approved,
but we expect BCBS to push hard to get them.
So why does Blue Cross want to raise rates?
Because BCBS of Michigan is the state’s “insurer-of-last-resort,”
they’re required by law to accept all applicants into a plan
regardless of their health history.
At some point, as the insurer would point out, they’ll
be paying more for health care bills then receiving revenue in health insurance
premiums — which is why they want to increase rates.
They’re asking the state to raise rates
for individual health plans by 56 percent, 42 percent for group conversion
plans which is extended coverage from an employer after a job loss, and 31
percent for Medicare Supplement plans (also called Medigap plans).
Comments[0]
Health Insurance Companies To Get Lower Payments For Medicare Advantage Plans Next Year
Wednesday Apr 08, 2009
Health Insurance Companies To Get Lower Payments For Medicare Advantage Plans Next Year in Individual Health Insurance
This week, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
announced they will cut the payments to health insurance companies for Medicare
Advantage plans by 4 to 4.5 percent.
It’s a promise kept by the Obama
Administration who said they would cut the private Medicare plans partly to
help fund a major health care and health insurance overhaul, reported the Wall
Street Journal.
According the WSJ article, insurers had expected
these cuts — but not until 2011.
So if and when these cuts go through, what does it
mean for the average policyholder in their Golden Years?
The general word from the insurance industry is
that those who have Medicare Advantage will see either reduced benefits or
increased premiums. Most likely it would be the latter because, honestly,
raising rates probably less of a hassle for insurers.
The Blue Cross Blue Shield Association said the increases
would average out between $50 and $80, wrote the WSJ article.
So what will these rate increases do to the some 10
million people are enrolled in Medicare
Advantage plan? Maybe more will drop it and move to regular Medicare. Maybe
insurance companies are making too much of a stink and the Medicare Advantage
market won’t be drastically affected.
As we seem to say a lot here… we’ll have
to wait and see.
Comments[0]
Government Slow To Reimburse COBRA Health Insurance Premiums
Tuesday Apr 07, 2009
Government Slow To Reimburse COBRA Health Insurance Premiums in Individual Health Insurance
Under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA),
the government is offering to pay 65 percent of premiums for COBRA continuation
health insurance
coverage if you involuntarily lost your job between September 1, 2008 and
December 31, 2009.
According to the U.S. Department of Labor (see the
excerpt below), laid-off workers were supposed to not have to worry about
fronting the premiums and the employers/plan administrators would be the party
to get the 65 percent reimbursement from the government.
Q10: How
does the 65% premium subsidy get paid to me?
You will not receive a payment. Assistance Eligible Individuals are responsible
for paying only 35% of the COBRA premium for the period of coverage. The
remaining 65% of the premium is reimbursed directly to the employer, plan
administrator, or insurance company through a payroll tax
credit.
But an article in the Washington Post said
everything might not be working as planned.
The author described his situation where he was
required to pay his COBRA continuation premium of more than $1,400 a month or
his coverage would be cancelled. Instead of paying 35 percent of the premium to
his former plan administrator, he had to front the money and wait for
reimbursement.
In the article, the author heard these
reimbursements might not be made available until this summer.
That’s much too long, and frankly it’s
an outrage this is happening. The DOL clearly states that it’s the
employers/plan administrators that have to put up the cash.
We’ll keep our ears open for similar
situations, but we hope this isn’t common. Let us know if it
is.
Comments[1]
Response to a Consumer Reports Article About Individual Health Insurance
Monday Apr 06, 2009
Response to a Consumer Reports Article About Individual Health Insurance in Individual Health Insurance
In an article by Consumer Reports, authors claim that there
are seven signs that an individual health insurance plan might be “junk.”
We thought we’d tackle a few of their claims and provide an alternative
look on what they said.
- Claim: Never to buy a plan with limited
benefits or a plan labeled ”not major medical.“
First off, don’t buy a health plan from any
company that’s not reputable. If an unknown insurer labels a plan “not
major medical” then it’s probably not from a company worth
dealing with.
When there’s a warning against “limited
benefits” it can actually be misleading. Those who are looking to cut
down on their monthly premiums and want to “trim the fat”
of their health plan (i.e. don’t want to pay for benefits they won’t
use), a plan with limited benefits might be a viable option.
For example, a single male wouldn’t want to pay
for maternity care for his individual
health insurance plan, but that same male would pay for maternity
care under an employer-sponsored plan. That’s because everyone pays and
shares a pool of benefits with employer coverage.
- Claim: Coverage limits should not be
lower than $100,000.
This claim is right of the bat misleading. This almost
suggests every plan you search for are going to be skinny on overall coverage
limits (in insurance terms, this is called lifetime maximum coverage). This is
not the case.
Consumer Reports is correct when they say your lifetime
limit shouldn’t be lower than $100,000 — but the lifetime
maximum for most plans from reputable insurers will come in around $1 to $2
million. And by the way, a million-dollar lifetime maximum will not super-size your premiums.
- Claim: Lower premiums means insurers
are trimming benefits.
Again, the article is misleading. Your health insurance
costs are all about balance and sharing risk. If you have more generous benefits,
less out-of-pocket costs, and lower deductibles, you’re going to have
higher monthly bills for your coverage. Lower premiums might mean lesser benefits,
but it doesn’t mean a “junk” plan by any means.
The key here is to balance what you can afford for your
monthly bill with what costs of care you can cover yourself (pay $50 for doctor’s
visit instead of $20 and you can find lower premiums).
The real thing to remember is health insurance isn’t
like buying an ice cream cone. It’s a complicated product with lots
of details. If you’re not sure about what you should buy or you’re
afraid you’ll miss some of the fine print, speak with your local insurance
agent for advice.
Comments[0]
California Health Insurance Coverage Rate Hit Hard By Recession
Friday Apr 03, 2009
California Health Insurance Coverage Rate Hit Hard By Recession in Individual Health Insurance
The now months long with no end in sight recession has hit California
health insurance particularly hard, according to a recent report from
UC Berkeley.
A staggering 500,000 California residents have lost
their health insurance coverage since November 2007, the Berkeley designated start
date of the recession, reported the San Francisco Gate.
That means 13.5 percent of all the Americans in the
country who lost their health insurance during this recession reside in
California. In total, 3.7 million
Americans lost health coverage in total since the start of the recession.
What’s more, the report estimated that
another 600,000 might find themselves uninsured in California alone and 4
million nationwide — and that’s even if the economy fully
recovers.
Ouch.
“Unless there’s some sort of
policy intervention, we won’t see a real recovery from where we are
right now. Given population growth and this ongoing decline in coverage rates,
the number of uninsured would actually continue to rise, ” said Ken
Jacobs, the report’s co-author and chairman of the Berkeley Center
for Labor Research and Education.
Comments[0]
New Health Insurance Program Cover Florida Not Attracting Enrollees
Thursday Mar 26, 2009
New Health Insurance Program Cover Florida Not Attracting Enrollees in Individual Health Insurance
So far, the Florida
health insurance program Cover Florida implemented by Governor
Charlie Crist hasn’t caught on with residents just yet.
Since January 5, 2009, only 952 residents have
signed up for the coverage, reported the Orlando Sentinel
— a sign that the program isn’t as good as option as
Governor Crist hoped for.
To help combat low enrollment numbers, Governor
Crist urged organizations around the state to promote the program.
“Spread the word that affordable health care
coverage is available,” said Governor Crist.
The Florida Community Health Action Information
Network, a health care advocacy group, wasn’t surprised by the low
numbers, wrote the Sentinel article.
“Since subsidies to help low-income
people pay their premiums were completely absent from the mix, even fewer of
those who might have considered the limited coverage before will do so now in
the midst of a recession,” said the group’s policy
director, Greg Mellowe.
Interesting take on it.
Does this mean the program is a failure or just
another casualty of the poor economy?
Comments[0]
A Friday Consumer Poll: Americans Like Their Health Insurance Coverage, But Think Costs Are Too High
Friday Mar 20, 2009
A Friday Consumer Poll: Americans Like Their Health Insurance Coverage, But Think Costs Are Too High in Individual Health Insurance
In a recent CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll, results founds
that Americans are happy with their current health insurance coverage.
Americans are please with the quality of the health
care they receive and overall happy with their coverage, reported CNN.
The poll found a whopping 8 in 10 people are
satisfied with the quality of health care and health
insurance in this country.
But when asked about the costs of these services,
satisfaction drops significantly.
Over 75 percent of Americans are “dissatisfied”
with overall health care costs in the U.S. and only 52 percent are happy with
health insurance rates.
“[The poll results] suggests a
prescription for health care reform that Americans can swallow —
start by addressing health care costs while allowing Americans to keep their
current coverage and their current health care providers,” said CNN
polling director, Keating Holland.
Really, this poll isn’t too shocking
— back during the 2008 election President Obama and Secretary of
State Hillary Clinton advocated the idea of letting Americans keep the coverage
they have if they like it.
Comments[0]